In any event, the plaintiff did not provide me with any authority to support the rather broad proposition advanced by her with regard to the scope of fiduciary duty. Admittedly, Norberg v. Wynrib, 1992 CanLII 65 (SCC), [1992] 2 S.C.R. 226 held that non-medical harm done to a patient in some circumstances will be found to be a breach of fiduciary duty that exists between doctor and patient. But it does seem to me a great stretch to find that a doctor who (even if she is aware of a patient’s emotional vulnerability), assaults her patient, necessarily breaches the fiduciary relationship.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.