In those circumstances, as I see it, the disclosure which he was given, which was in substance, save perhaps for the identity of the source, what was considered by the decision-makers, was not deficient so as to preclude any meaningful response by him, nor did it prevent him from knowing the case he had to meet. Nor in my view would the decisions which were based upon the information in its totality be unreasonable in the sense of being “outside the range of possible acceptable outcomes which are defensible in respect of the facts and law” or lacking “justification, transparency and intelligibility” as set out in Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick at para. 47.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.