I agree with the petitioner that it would be improper for the adjudicator, or this court, to infer that the difference between the serial number recorded in the Report to Superintendent and the one in the calibration certificate was a typographical error or a mere technical irregularity. To do so would be to apply a presumption of accuracy unsupported by the evidence, something the courts have regularly warned against: Modhgill v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2012 BCSC 1971 at para. 8 and Verdonk v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2015 BCSC 215 at paras. 45-46.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.