The defendants’ counsel argues that the wording in the plaintiff’s engagement letter is even more uncertain than the letter in Chamberlain, supra. Further, a fee arrangement which permits one party to impose unilateral discretionary increases, is not a contract because there is no certainty as to an essential ingredient; the fee which will be charged: Moir v. Trenciansky, [1989] B.C.J. No. 564 (Q.L.) (B.C.S.C.), Shaw J. Accordingly, the most the plaintiff firm can do is to claim on a quantum meruit.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.