The defendants further say that this per quod action is one of pure economic loss and will raise the question of remoteness of damages. They cite D'Amato v. Badger, 1996 CanLII 166 (SCC), [1996] 2 S.C.R. 1071 as an example of the type of action in which a company's claim for pure economic loss was not successful and addressed the question of remoteness of damages in the peculiar circumstances of that case.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.