As a preliminary matter, the plaintiff argued that the bill of costs drawn by the defendant is incorrect in form and content. It is suggested that the bill should be based on the tariff in effect after July 1, 2010. I reject this argument for reasons set out in Milkovich v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, supra. The tariff in place when the notice of discontinuance was filed applies to the defendant’s claim for costs.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.