Finding a defendant’s actions responsible for a plaintiff’s harm simply because the harms followed them in time can easily lead to a false conclusion. Ehrcke J. cautioned against the dangers of this well-known logical fallacy. He suggested that where temporal connections between two events form the basis for conclusions about the relationship between them, a judge must carefully examine the causes : White v. Stonestreet, 2006 BCSC 801, at paras. 75-76.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.