I agree with the Crown that this is not an issue of admissibility of expert evidence under R v. Mohan, 1994 CanLII 80 (SCC), [1994] 2 S.C.R. 9. With respect, I do not find Sanghera applicable or instructive. That case was addressing an application to have a police officer accepted as an expert witness to translate portions of intercepted communications. The undercover officer in this case was a participant in a conversation; he was a contemporaneous listener and could relate that content to the trial judge. He was also cross-examined on that evidence.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.