In order to overlook this intermingling and dismiss the appeal under s. 613(1)(b)(iii), we have to ask ourselves if the jury would necessarily have reached the same result and convicted the accused if the error above described had not been made. I observe that the Crown bears the onus of demonstrating that the verdict would necessarily have been the same if the errors had not occurred (Colpitts v. The Queen, 1965 CanLII 2 (SCC), [1966] 1 C.C.C. 146).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.