At p. 191 the authors say: It is clear from the cases that a payment cannot be adopted by a debtor so as to perfect his discharge if it was not made with intent to discharge any debt at all. (emphasis added) And, referring to Smith v. Cox, [1940] 2 K.B. 558, that: [A] landlady’s agent, taking pity on her age and poverty, paid over to her the amount of rent which a recalcitrant tenant had failed to pay. Here too it is clear that the intervener never intended his payment as a discharge of the defaulting tenant. (emphasis added)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.