They were in agreement also that to be admissible the conviction must be relevant to the issues in the civil proceedings; but that identity of issues is not essential; that lack of identity goes to the weight and significance of the conviction and not admissibility. In coming to that conclusion they were in disagreement with Royal Bank v. McArthur, supra, where Anderson J. held there must be a "clear and undeniable identity" as a condition of admissibility.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.