I agree with Johnstone J.’s conclusion (at para. 33) of Wahl that: Courts have generally regarded a child over the age of majority who is in full-time attendance at an educational institution as a “child of the marriage” and therefore entitled to support. There has been a general acceptance of education pursuits as a “cause” that renders a child unable to withdraw from his or her parents’ charge: Fair v. Jones, [1999] N.W.T.J. No. 44 (S.C.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.