In the immediate roadside prohibition application review scheme the courts have drawn a distinction between: “(1) adjudicators applying knowledge or expertise to the interpretation of evidence properly before them and known to the driver; and (2) the prohibited approach of using specialized knowledge unavailable to the driver, in the place of evidence” (Ergen v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2016 BCSC 643, at para 24).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.