Since the Gordon v. Goertz decision ((1996) 1996 CanLII 191 (SCC), 19 R.F.L. (4th) 177 (S.C.C.)), the courts have considered the following factors in determining whether a proposed move is in a child’s best interests: 1. the parenting capabilities of, and the child’s relationship with, the parents and their new partners; 2. employment, security and prospect of the parents and their partners; 3. access to, and support of, extended family; 4. the difficulty of exercising the proposed access and the quality of the proposed access if the move is allowed; 5. the effect of the move on the child’s academic situation; 6. The psychological and emotional wellbeing of the child; 7. the disruption of the child’s existing social and community support and routine; 8. the desirability of the proposed new family unit for the child; 9. the relative parenting capabilities of either parent and their respective ability to discharge parenting responsibilities; 10. the child’s relationship with both parents; 11. the separation of siblings; and 12. the retraining or education opportunities for the moving parent.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.