The gist of the respondent’s submissions here is that the doctrine of abuse of process is a flexible one which is unencumbered by the specific requirements of issue estoppel in res judicata. The Respondent submits that even though the strict requirements of issue estoppel may not be met, the courts have applied the doctrine in holding that to allow a relitigation to proceed would “nonetheless violate such principles as judicial economy, consistency, finality and the integrity of justice.”: Toronto v. CUPE, supra, para. 37.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.