The competing view of the nature of the burden of proving reliance in a case of fraudulent misrepresentation is that the legal burden of proving all of the elements of fraudulent misrepresentation rests on the plaintiff. Although Parna v. G. & S. Properties Limited, 1970 CanLII 25 (SCC), [1971] S.C.R. 306, 15 D.L.R. (3d) 336 at 343-44 did not address this point, Spence J.'s comments are cited at times for this proposition. … …
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.