[7] The text then goes on to say: The court’s position [that is, in Udy v. Stewart] on this point was that this defect goes to competency and not just to weight. That result may be too harsh. Unless the handicap of a witness is such that his mental or intellectual capacity totally negates his ability to relate what he saw, then his evidence should be received and any extenuating circumstances should be considered a matter of weight and credibility . . . as, of course, opposed to competency.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.