What is the standard of review of the exercise of the court’s inherent jurisdiction?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Ziebenhaus v. Bahlieda, 2014 ONSC 138 (CanLII):

The respondents submit that the standard of review of the exercise of the court’s inherent jurisdiction should be as set out in Kostopoulos v. Jesshope, [1985] O.J. No. 2295 at para. 48 in respect of the exercise of judicial discretion. In that decision, Robins J.A. stated that “it must be shown that the discretion was exercised arbitrarily or capriciously or was based upon a wrong or inapplicable principle of law”.

Other Questions


Can the court exercise parens patriae jurisdiction in circumstances where the legislation does not contain a provision in which the courts have jurisdiction? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a decision of a court by an appellate court? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the Court of Appeal have jurisdiction to order a transfer of a cause into this court from another court? (Ontario, Canada)
Inherent jurisdiction is not unlimited, does the Court have any power to exercise it? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a decision by the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Canada? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for an Assessment Officer to be reviewed by the Court of Appeal? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review in judicial review? (Ontario, Canada)
Does this court have jurisdiction to issue a stay of a deportation order pursuant to section 134(2) of the Courts of Justice Act? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the principles of the Court of Arbitration for the purpose of making decisions at an arbitrator rather than the court? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any difference in jurisdiction between a provincial court and a federal court? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.