In 1985, in Richardson v. Richardson, 1 R.F.L.(3d) 67, a similar motion was brought before this court in a matter involving child maintenance -- although not its taxability. The court stated on p.68: ....we think it clear that the judgment of the court as entered, which gave effect to the reasons for judgment, amends the decree nisi so that it now reads as it should have read, in our opinion, when issued on 12th May 1983. The effect of the judgment was to make the order which we think the trial judge ought to have made in the first place.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.