It has to be noted that Mitrow J. is only suggesting usage of an assessment report at a motion where the court is making an order which is “not a substantive departure from an existing order or status quo.” It is also to be noted that Mitrow J. is careful to distinguish between evidence contained in the assessment report from its conclusions; in making his determination, he follows Forte v. Forte, 2004 CanLII 7631 (ON SC), [2004] O.J. No. 1738 (S.C.J.) where Corbett J. stated: However, I cannot accept that the court is precluded from considering all of the evidence that is available in coming to a determination of the best interests of the children. In particular, in this case, I do not accept that the court cannot consider the statements made by the children to the assessor. It is not the report's recommendations, but its substance and analysis that is of value. (emphasis mine)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.