Counsel’s argument, therefore, is constructed on adverse impact upon the integrity of the justice system as a result of the delays in responding to the inquiries respecting its intentions in light of the lateral transfer. Focusing on the stress placed by Martin v. Gray on the need to preserve high standards in the legal profession to maintain confidence in the justice system, he relies on that authority’s endorsement of the “trend”, which preceding para. 110 notes Martin v. Gray recognized, of assurances that lateral transfers not only create “no actual conflict but that there be no appearance of conflict”.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.