While an appellate court will usually give great deference to a trial judge’s assessments of credibility, deference will not necessarily be warranted if the evidentiary and analytical basis for those credibility findings are not supportable or disclose palpable and overriding error. As noted in Housen v. Nikolaisen, “[I]t is open to an appellate court to find that an inference of fact made by a trial judge is clearly wrong” (per Major and Iacobucci JJ at paragraph 22). If the evidentiary and analytical base for the inference is lacking, the resulting inference will be “clearly wrong”.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.