Most of the issues raised by the appellant deal with findings of fact made by the trial judge. The appellant properly concedes such findings should only be reversed when it is established the trial judge made a “palpable and overriding error” (see: H.L. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2005 SCC 25, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 401 and Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.