In Meyer v. Bright, supra, our Court of Appeal also confirmed that a plaintiff has the burden of proving that he or she falls within the legislated threshold exceptions for the advancement of such claims, and indicated that the appropriate approach to such threshold determinations was to answer, sequentially, the following questions: 1. Has the injured person sustained permanent impairment of a bodily function by continuing injury which is physical in nature? 2. If the answer to question number 1 is “yes”, is the bodily function, which is permanently impaired, an important one? 3. If the answer to question number 2 is “yes”, is the impairment of the important bodily function serious?
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.