How have courts interpreted the principles of the BCCA?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from NMH Holdings Limited v. The Crestmark Developments Limited Partnership, 2012 BCSC 2216 (CanLII):
Though these principles are easily stated, their application is often challenging. In Strauss v. Jarvis, 2007 BCCA 605 at para. 7, Mackenzie J.A., for the court, said:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court in BCSC 871 interpret the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of the Canadian Court of Justice's decision on the doctrine of common law? (British Columbia, Canada)
How can a court interpret a contract where a party's subsequent conduct is interpreted? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a "deposit clause" in standard form contracts? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the general principles of the BCSC in determining whether a will maker was a cause of litigation? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of the BCCA? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the Court interpreted the Charter as an aid to statutory interpretation? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the principles used by the Court of Appeal in making an order to refer the issue to the Superior Court of Justice? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the principle of equalization in the context of the Rules of Justice? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the principles of tortfeasor's law been interpreted in the context of the case law, and what are the principles with respect to animals generally? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is the Chief Justice of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of B.C holding that the Court has jurisdiction to determine whether a person who is not a party to a particular type of tortfeasor has a valid claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
