Where one justice has granted relief on the basis an appeal does not lack merit, another justice, hearing a subsequent application, cannot grant relief sought because the appeal does lack merit. Where it has been said by the first the issues in an appeal are worthy of leave to appeal being granted, it is not for the second to deny an extension of time to perfect the appeal on the basis it has no hope of success: Sekhon v. Armstrong, 2003 BCCA 318, paras. 27-28. It was not then open to the justice who ordered the appellant to post security for costs to make the order she did on the basis the appeal was bound to fail.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.