When applying s. 18, the court must assess the fairness of a spouse’s allocation of pre-tax corporation income between business and family purposes, applying the test of an objective, well-informed parent in the same circumstances having regard to the objectives of the Guidelines: Kowalewich v. Kowalewich, 2001 BCCA 450 at paras. 44–45. As a general rule, monies needed to maintain the value of a business as a viable going concern will not be available for support purposes and should not be included in determining annual income: Kowalewich at para. 58.
The onus is on the payor to provide evidence that a corporation’s pre-tax income is not available to the payor: Hausmann v. Klukas, 2009 BCCA 32 at paras. 50–52, leave to appeal ref’d [2009] SCCA No. 135.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.