The Chambers Judge’s conclusion on this point is correct. Canadian law permits recovery on the basis of the doctrine of unjust enrichment when three elements are present: (a) an enrichment of or to the defendant, (b) the corresponding deprivation of the plaintiff, and (c) the absence of a juristic reason for the enrichment. See: Kerr v. Baranow, 2011 SCC 10, [2011] 1 S.C.R. 269 at para. 32.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.