In Earle v. Martin, [1998] N.J. No. 353 (S.C.) the eaves of the defendant’s house encroached .16 metres over the plaintiff’s property and a fence encroached .25 metres over the boundary line. The court found that the offending objects, which were fixed in place and did not constitute accidental incursion on the plaintiff’s property confirmed that the trespass was a continuing one.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.