In Sutherland v. Attorney General of Canada, [1997] B.C.J. No. 2550 (S.C.), 15 C.P.C. (4th) 329, 75 A.C.W.S. (3d) 218, the court stated that a finding of nuisance depended on two findings of fact: (1) that the conduct or acts complained of substantially interfered with the use and enjoyment of property; and (2) that the interference was unreasonable in light of all the surrounding circumstances.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.