Liability for the accident has been admitted, but liability for damages such as ongoing loss of income has not been admitted. This is similar to the facts in Logue v. Holt, [2004] N.B.J., wherein liability for the accident was admitted, but not for ongoing damages for loss of income. Mr. Justice Grant found that a claim for advance payment for lost wages could not be ordered because “there is a triable defence”. He stated that a further advance could “do damage to the defence”.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.