The defendants further submit, again relying on Glyn v. Weston Feature Film Co., that the court must refuse protection in the interest of its own integrity. This is an interesting argument mounted by the defendants; however, neither the plaintiffs nor the defendants come to this court in moral innocence. The plaintiffs produce works in another country which are contrary to the moral values in Canada. The defendants have pirated these works and have distributed them in our country. Is the court’s integrity better served by ignoring theft than by refusing protection to obscenity? I think not.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.