The jurisprudence is clear on proceedings under the Act: it is a child-centered, not a parent-centered, lens through which the court must view the evidence. Further, in the well-known case of King v. Low, 1985 CanLII 59 (SCC), [1985] 1 S.C.R. 87, at p. 39, the court writes: “.... the dominant consideration to which all other considerations must remain subordinate must be the welfare of the child....Parental claims must not be lightly set aside, and they are entitled to serious consideration in reaching any conclusion. Where it is clear that the welfare of the child requires it, however, they must be set aside.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.