In the following year in Wade v. James [1966] 1 Q.B. 273, Lord Denning, after comparing the test to be applied by an appeal count reviewing awards by a judge with that employed when the award is by judge and jury, followed with this observation at p. 300: "Although the test is so similar, nevertheless in, practice the result is very different." and again at p. 301: "In future this court will not feel the same hesitation as it formerly did in upsetting an award of damages by a jury."
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.