Are issues relating to the interpretation of statutes and to the jurisdiction of the court reviewable for correctness?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from 783783 Alberta Ltd. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2010 ABCA 226 (CanLII):
Issues relating to the interpretation of statutes, and to the jurisdiction of the court are also issues of law reviewable for correctness: Thomson v. Canada (Deputy Minister of Agriculture), 1992 CanLII 121 (SCC), [1992] 1 S.C.R. 385, 133 N.R. 345 at para. 77. Issues
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the courts interpreted the meaning of a contract where the contract is expressly or implication forbidden by common or statute law? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the provisions of section 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867 been interpreted and interpreted by the courts? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of review for an appellate court reviewing a trial decision? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Court allow the Court to amend the Rules of Civil Procedure to allow the Courts to use the functional approach? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts dealt with the issue of custody and custody issues in a motion of motion of the same name? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there any case law in which the Court of Appeal has found an absence of jurisdiction or excess of jurisdiction? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the Charter and the role of the courts? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a court order all court-ordered sales of a personal injury property be exempt from all court ordered sales? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts in the United States and Canada interpreted the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of a motion for summary judgment? (Alberta, Canada)
What jurisdiction does the court have to entertain custody and access proceedings if the child was present, resident or domiciled in the jurisdiction at the time of the proceedings? (Alberta, Canada)
