The adjudicator dealt with this issue by referring to the decision in Smithson v. Superintendent of Motor Vehicles and Attorney General of British Columbia, 2005 BCSC 411, noted that it was distinguishable on the facts, then said: There is no need to speculate or draw inferences with respect to the reason for the delay in your case – the officer clearly explains the reason in his evidence. I conclude the reason for the delay was legitimate and justified and accordingly I reject your lawyer’s argument in this regard.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.