I am cognizant of the law in this area. For a change to be sufficient to justify a variation, it must be one which has altered the ability of the parents to meet the children’s needs in a fundamental way. The court must also ask itself whether the previous order might have been different had the circumstances which now exist prevailed earlier, and whether or not those circumstances might have been foreseen or reasonably contemplated by the judge who made the previous order: Rew v. Rew, 2003 BCSC 18, para. 19.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.