The Court of Appeal in Peel Law Assn. at paras. 71 and 72 explained the distinction between the burden of proof which, in this context, rests upon the Commission and complainant and the shifting of the evidentiary burden to the respondent after a prima facie case has been established, adopting the reasons of Sopinka J. in Snell v. Farrell, 1990 CanLII 70 (SCC), [1990] 2 S.C.R. 311 at pp. 329–30:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.