Master Groves referred in his reasons to the decision of Burnyeat, J. in One v. One, [2000] B.C.J. No. 2178 (S.C.). In that case, the court identified twelve factors which had been reviewed in deciding what is in the best interests of children. Those factors are as follows: (a) parenting capabilities of and children’s relationship with parents and new partners; (b) employment security and prospects of each spouse and, where appropriate, their partner; (c) access to and support of extended family; (d) difficulty of exercising proposed access and quality of proposed access if move is allowed; (e) effect upon children’s academic situation; (f) psychological/emotional well-being of children; (g) disruption of children’s existing social and community support and routines; (h) desirability of proposed new family unit for children; (i) relative parenting capabilities of either parent and respective ability to discharge their parenting responsibilities; (j) child’s relationship with both parents; (k) separation of siblings; and (l) retraining/educational opportunities for moving parent.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.