On the other hand, where the application judge has made an error in principle, for example, by failing to consider the requisite elements of the legal test or standard, or has erred in the application of that test or standard, the court is entitled to intervene. For a recent example of such intervention, see this court’s decision in McGrath v. Joy, 2022 ONCA 119.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.