In the case at bar, it must be determined whether the torture the applicant suffered was so appalling that this experience alone is a compelling reason not to return him to his country, even if there is no longer any fear of further persecution. Unfortunately for the applicant, this provision was not raised at the hearing and the panel was accordingly not required to consider applying it. In Gyamfuah v. Canada,7 Madam Justice Simpson said the following on this issue:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.