The appellant relies in part on the decision in Feldman v. Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario, [1992] O.J. No. 2531 (Div. Ct.). There, the court wrote the following: [I]t is better as a matter of practice, particularly in the case of a principal witness whose credibility is severely attacked, to refrain from introducing previous complaints as exhibits to be adopted during the testimony of the witness.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.