In Charko v. Charko, [1997] S.J. No. 516 the court had the benefit of expert evidence from a specialist in family law who testified as to the information a lawyer should have about the financial circumstances of the parties before advising one party to enter into a domestic agreement. This would include a complete list of all assets and liabilities, proper valuation of all the assets as well as the income tax returns for the previous three years. Although the court found that the advice and handling of the wife’s case did not measure up to the standards proposed by the expert, the court considered other relevant circumstances and determined that while the agreement was “somewhat improvident” it was not grossly unfair or unconscionable and declined to set it aside.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.