Can a finding of undue influence be based on the balance of probabilities?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Ross-Scott v. Potvin, 2014 BCSC 435 (CanLII):
The plaintiffs argue that a finding of undue influence can result from circumstantial evidence which exists is based on the balance of probabilities: Hix v. Ewachniuk, 2010 BCCA 317.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is undue influence sufficient to establish that there is no force or coercion to establish undue influence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal framework for analyzing proof in solemn form claims where issues of undue influence and undue influence are raised? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law relating to undue influence or undue influence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a formal offer to settle a claim against a plaintiff be apportioned costs based upon division of liability based upon a division of costs based on division of liabilities? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for setting aside a transaction where the donor was allegedly influenced by undue influence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of proof for a plaintiff to prove that a hypothetical event is not a probability, not a balance of probabilities? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a finding that a judge must not make a finding which would directly contradict a finding previously made by another judge? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the remedy for a finding of undue influence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing on a balance of probabilities that a contract was formed? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the presumption of undue influence trigger? (British Columbia, Canada)
