In the case of George v. George, [1993] 2 Canadian Native Law Reporter, page 112, Justice Coultas, when considering a division of matrimonial property between Indians who were then members of the British Columbia Indian band, held that a certificate of possession described in section 20(2) is only evidence of an Indian’s right to possession of land in a reserve.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.