Once the trial judge found that there was no actual undue influence, he was required to inquire into the nature of the relationship between the parties to determine whether that relationship triggered a presumption of undue influence. Once he found the presumption to have arisen, the onus shifted to Dimitra to rebut it: Geffen v. Goodman Estate, 1991 CanLII 69 (SCC), [1991] 2 S.C.R. 353, at 378-9.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.