The Court of Appeal for Ontario has ruled that, “[w]hile it may be appropriate, in the exercise of a judge's overriding discretion, to reduce the quantum of costs that a party will have to pay because of their financial condition, this principle does not apply in the reverse”: Beaver v. Hill, at para. 18. “There is no principle relating to costs that requires wealthier individuals to pay more for costs for the same step in a proceeding than less wealthy ones”: Beaver v. Hill, at para. 18.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.