It is well settled that a review of the decision of a judge in chambers by a panel of the court is not a rehearing of the original application. The test for review is: was the chambers judge wrong in law, or wrong in principle, or did the chambers judge misconceive the facts. If the chambers judge did not commit any of those errors then the division of the court in review should not change the order of the chambers judge: DeFehr v. DeFehr, 2002 BCCA 129 at para. 6.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.