The following excerpt is from Wallace International Silversmiths, Inc. v. Heritage Silversmiths Inc., 1997 CanLII 12364 (ON SC):
Counsel for the applicant argued that the following passage from Carruthers v. Whitaker, [1975] 2 N.Z.L.R. 667, at 671 is applicable: It is established by the evidence to which I have earlier referred that at the time when the parties instructed their respective solicitors, they all had in mind only one form of contract which would govern the sale and purchase of the farm, namely, a formal agreement in writing to be prepared and approved by the solicitors. When parties in negotiation for the sale and purchase of property act in this way, then the ordinary inference from their conduct is that they have in mind and intent to contract by a document which each would be required to sign. It is unreasonable to suppose that either party would contemplate that anything short of the signing of the document by both parties would bring finality to their negotiations. Furthermore, both parties would expect their solicitors to handle the transaction in a way which would give them proper protection from the legal point of view.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.