When is a piece of sod that fell off a pick-up truck not cargo but debris?

Yukon, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Skookum, 2019 YKSC 8 (CanLII):

The appellant also relies on the decision of Michel v. John Doe, 2008 BCSC 40, to submit that the piece of sod that fell off the pick-up truck was not cargo but debris. In that decision, the presiding judge found that a rock constituted “debris foreign to the cargo of logs”. The court acknowledged that the regulation at stake in that case imposed a high standard with regard to containment on cargo. However, the judge was not persuaded that the regulation went as far as requiring containment “that would completely prevent dislodgement of contamination of a load by debris such as rocks, soil, ice, snow or mud that may have been inadvertently trapped in the log cargo during the loading process”.

Other Questions


What is the test for estoppel in employment law? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the test for a judge to reopen a civil trial before judgment has been rendered? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on "originalism" in the context of constitutional interpretation? (Yukon, Canada)
Is there any case law supporting a limitation clause in a contract? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the test for applying the principle against multiple convictions? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the standard of review for an appellate court reviewing an exercise of exercise of authority? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the difference between the corporate income method and the personal services method? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the limitation of recovery under a particular liability insurance policy? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the standard for assessment by the clerk under Rule 60(4) of the BC Tax Code? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the impact of the fifth criterion in assessing damages? (Yukon, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.